Comments
« sabir234 wrote on Saturday, May 23 at 02:40 PM »
« bonnyer wrote on Friday, May 22 at 07:47 PM »
« Movie8K wrote on Wednesday, May 20 at 04:37 AM »
Veridicus1
|
May 19, 2015
While in no way defending this individual's reported actions, it should be noted that scientific studies based on legitimate empirical evidence do not support the ignorance and hate driven mass hysteria and moral panic that currently surrounds so-called "child pornography." According to several objective studies, including Howitt, D (1995) Pornography and the paedophile: Is it criminogenic? British Journal of Medical Psychology, 68, 15-27, the viewing of this material is harmless and does not lead to behaviors which are currently considered to be criminal. Many – perhaps most - of those charged with possessing and viewing so-called "child pornography" have never been involved with a child. Also, the conjecture that all "pornography" is taken without consent is not borne out by empirical facts, and the delusion that children are hurt every time their image is viewed simply is not rational – the child most likely never knows about such viewings. For an essay discussing this subject published in a reputable scientific journal, see http://www.shfri.net/effects/effects.cgi For a free downloadable 94 page book on these issues which includes voluntary anonymous testimony from now grown former child "actors," see http://www.shfri.net/shfp/beyond/beyond.html
« Bill Mabrey wrote on Friday, May 15 at 02:07 PM »
« Molly Walker wrote on Thursday, May 14 at 02:17 PM »
« _Brian_Kelly_ wrote on Thursday, May 14 at 07:48 AM »
« _Brian_Kelly_ wrote on Thursday, May 14 at 07:47 AM »
« _Brian_Kelly_ wrote on Thursday, May 14 at 07:45 AM »
« Julia McKenzie wrote on Tuesday, May 12 at 08:40 AM »
Blogs
Discussion
Recent Events

Recent Classifieds

event calendar Icon_info

Sunday, May 24, 2015

no events are posted for this date post one now Icon_info
Featured Businesses